Search for: "Crawford " Results 2601 - 2620 of 6,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 10:35 pm
Her must-read post on the Sotomayor nomination ends: "But a second vacancy could soon be in the cards. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 4:43 pm
NPR; Mike Pitts; NY Times; Washington Post; USA Today; LA Times; Dahlia Lithwick (Slate); Wall Street Journal; Legal Times; Bob Bauer; Orin Kerr (and here).... [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am by Viking
Professor Friedman, a true guru of “confrontation” issues notes: It appears that the next case in the Melendez-Diaz line will come very quickly. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am by Viking
Professor Friedman, a true guru of “confrontation” issues notes: It appears that the next case in the Melendez-Diaz line will come very quickly. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 8:40 am
The Minnesota court, applying Teague, ruled that Crawford was not to be applied retroactively in state cases. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:25 am
” The case involved the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:19 pm by Daniel D. Blinka
Crawford may have been a “pathmarking” opinion, but so far the Court has been an unreliable pathfinder. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:13 pm
Judge Crawford concurred in part and dissented in part. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm by WCK Director
In addition, Crawford provides liability, motor and property claims management services in Europe under the Broadspire brand. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:38 pm
The dispute over whether this particular error was plain is not terribly significant, since it will be unlikely to apply to any post-Crawford cases--cases in which, presumably, all of the trial participants would be attuned to the importance of a lab report's testimonial status and in which the defense should have preserved a Crawford issue.But there is one additional fascinating aspect of Judge Erdmann's majority opinion. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 12:46 am
Whether the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation, as outlined in Crawford v. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 3:09 am
It's a Crawford case decided a month after the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
  There are three days — today, Thursday, and next Monday — in which the Court will be announcing its opinions, and there are still fourteen merits cases to be decided, including a Crawford issue on expert testimony, the two cases on life without parole for juvenile homicide offenders, the applicability of Blakely to fines, and the retroactivity of the reduction in crack penalties. [read post]