Search for: "Doe v. Marshall"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 2,802
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2008, 6:02 pm
Judge Kaye said the V-cut of robes makes for an awkward fit for women, while a perfect fit for a man with a shirt and tie. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:31 am
Judge Kaye said the V-cut of robes makes for an awkward fit for women, while a perfect fit for a man with a shirt and tie. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Prison officials had asserted that kosher meals were available only to Jewish inmates and that plaintiff's faith does not require him to limit himself to a kosher diet.In Linehan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
It is a case of a coach imposing a new offense on a team for which he does (yet) not have the right personnel. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:55 am
(Credit: AP/Jane Rosenberg) Today, we’d like to marshal some more possible evidence on that front. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 7:14 pm
James Marshall Hendrix Foundation, which the Ninth Circuit affirmed last year, foreclosed plaintiffs from claiming trademark rights in the subject marks. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:43 pm
SPEEDY TRIALUnited States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 2:59 pm
By Eric Goldman Copyright * Granger v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
Doe ("Smith") and Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:45 pm
Doe ("Smith") and Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 1:37 pm
Singh v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
View the original article here Print this. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 10:23 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:30 am
In CA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
Lee Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
Thurgood Marshall, William J. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 1:56 pm
Thurgood Marshall, William J. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:43 pm
On June 26, 2008, in Absher v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 9:15 am
A good argument can be made that it does not. [read post]
