Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 2601 - 2620 of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2013, 12:38 am
The questions referred for a preliminary ruling are: 1. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
 This is a requirement of “fair and lawful processing” (see DPA, Sch 1, Part II). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:01 am by Kit Case
The Washington State Labor Council posted the following in their Legislative Update newsletter on March 29, 2013. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
Does 1-11 (E.D.N.Y. 2020) ("Allowing a plaintiff to proceed anonymously may also hamper witnesses coming forward of their own volition to either bolster or refute a plaintiff's allegations. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:28 am by Russ Bensing
  Robertson is indicted in October of 2008 for rape of Jane Doe #1. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
DOE This case concerns the termination of parental rights of Jane Doe III (Doe). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:34 pm by Zachary Spilman
App., 29 Nov 2011) (hereinafter Wilkins II). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am by Roel van Woudenberg
"1.3 In comparison to above claim, claim 1 of the main request has been amended as follows:"1. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 6:54 am
The report does not mention a discussion of issues with the Hwang work that appeared in 88 JPTOS 239 (March 2006). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 9:50 am
Under the Ordinance, anyone who engages in the conduct listed in Ordinance § 38-29(b)(1)-(7) is deemed to possess the requisite intent to engage in drug-related activity, regardless of his or her actual purpose. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 29 May 2003, the police arrested defendant in Kings County, and recovered a quantity of cocaine weighing in excess of one-eighth of an ounce from a bag which the police observed defendant throw into his car. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:09 am by George
 However, this setting does not restrict those users that already follow you; it only restricts user’s tweets from the general public. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 3:19 am
Television broadcasting of a graphic user interface does not constitute communication to the public of a work protected by copyright within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29.The reason for the Court's second holding is simple. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It does not describe any other application. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Nor does the PTO inquire into whether the famous person also sells the goods or services in question, as it does with private individuals under Section 1052(c). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
According to the transitional provisions under Article 7 of the Act revising the EPC of 29 November 2000 (Special edition No. 1, OJ EPO 2007, 197) in conjunction with Article 1, last sentence of the Decision of the Administrative Council of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under Article 7 of the Act revising the European Patent Convention of 29 November 2000, A 54(4) EPC 1973 shall apply to patents already granted at the time of entry into force of the… [read post]
On September 29, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal decided that Google’s search engine service is subject to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). [read post]