Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 5,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Decided on June 16, 2022 No. 55 [*1]In the Matter of DCH Auto, & c. et al., Appellants, vTown of Mamaroneck, & c., et al., Respondents. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Decided on June 16, 2022 No. 55 [*1]In the Matter of DCH Auto, & c. et al., Appellants, vTown of Mamaroneck, & c., et al., Respondents. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:55 am
Table 1. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 pm
According to the HUD-1 settlement statement generated for the [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:35 pm
E485 1. 2016 update Wills and Estate Planning- Free Seminar, January 13, 2016; Wednesday 12:15PM-1PM and again 5:15PM-6PM at the Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen, 2053 Woodbridge Ave, Edison, NJ 08817. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
There must have been an awful lot of evidence to read, because it wasn't until January 2010 that the Opposition Division dismissed the Article 8(1)(b) opposition since there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 11:15 am
," PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 25, no. 1 (2020) [full-text]"Data Collection: Lessons Learned from the Covid-19 Pandemic in Rohingya Refugee Camps, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh," Alternative Humanitaires = Humanitarian Alternatives, no. 15 (Nov. 2020) [open access] "Do No Harm? [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 8:53 am
The results show that the public does not consider this a closed case. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am
Code § 1037(a)(1). [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:31 pm
Attached is the Inspection Test Electronic Data Form from 1/27/2011 showing that the machine was not in compliance because it says “Compliance No” instead of “Compliance Yes. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:01 am
Id.at *39-40. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:47 am
But the interfering party does not need to be a neighbor. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
The only recorded vote indicates that it was opposed in the House by a nearly 2-1 margin (32-17). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
The text of the Federal Rules offers more guidance than does Section 90.701 because it specifies that lay opinion testimony is not based on “specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
Both copies were filed with the letter dated 27 November 2008 of the representative of Mr Lee requesting the respective “update” of the EPR. [4.2] Pursuant to Article 39(1)(b) PCT, A 153 EPC, R 159(1) EPC the present international patent application entered the European phase on 10 November 2004, i.e. 31 months from its international filing date of 10 April 2002. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
AC case on May 31, 2021 as her last case before her retirement from the SCC on July 1, 2021. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
If it does not, the compensation act does not disturb any existing remedy. [read post]
