Search for: "FISH v. STATE" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm by WIMS
"       Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) said, "President Obama is right to say our nation needs to safely and responsibly develop and produce oil and natural gas in the United States while protecting our environment, and right to say we need to develop a wide range of energy sources for the future. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:52 pm by WIMS
Climate Change Negotiator Position Announcement Pacific Merchant Shipping Asso. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am by Joe Consumer
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am by Joe Consumer
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) listed the delta smelt as a threatened species in 1993 under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and designated critical habitat for the delta smelt. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Keith Rizzardi
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”) listed the delta smelt as a threatened species in 1993 under the Endangered Species Act... [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
Bloomsbury International Limited and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, heard Wednesday 23 – Thursday 24 March 2011. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:01 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0209, 2011 MT 51, BITTERROOT RIVER PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellee, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS, Involuntary Plaintiff, v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
  The issues are (1) whether the power of the Sea Fish Industry Authority to impose a levy under section 4 of the Fisheries Act 1981 extends to sea fish or sea fish products which are “landed” in a non-UK country and then imported into the UK; and (2) if the power does so extend to imported fish, whether the levy is contrary to articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as an impermissible charge having an effect… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The 11th Circuit rejected that argument last week in US v. [read post]