Search for: "HALL v. STATE" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2018, 8:02 am by Brian Hall
By Brian Hall Agreeing with the district court’s assessment that “résumé misrepresentations by a senior human resources professional represent an infraction so egregious as to defy correction by mere counseling or other lesser discipline,” the 6th Circuit on April 23, 2018, rejected an appeal from a summary judgment order on claims of pregnancy, race, and age discrimination and retaliation in Bailey v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
The biggest news of the week is Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
As the State's opposition in Brewer correctly notes, there is a dynamic tension between the cornerstone of Texas capital jurisprudence, Jurek v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:27 am
The late Harry Blackmun wrote, in dissent, in Herrera v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:07 pm by cdw
“ Under errata, there is  Joshua Wayne Andrews v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Jack Kennedy, Olswang LLP
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]