Search for: "High v State" Results 2601 - 2620 of 35,513
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On Monday, March 6, the US Supreme Court agreed to hear an insurance coverage dispute, Great Lakes Insurance SE v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Among Republicans defending Trump, the basic Constitutional theme was that the phrase “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” sets an extraordinarily high bar for impeachment. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 7 March 2023, the High Court of Australia revoked Facebook Inc’s special leave to appeal to the High Court in the case of Facebook Inc v Australian Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] HCATrans 22. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
In Rev M Burns v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] UKET 1805182/2021, Mr Burns had been an Assistant Chaplain at HMP Wakefield and was dismissed in June 2021 following growing concerns about his performance. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Khan cannot further her stated goals by applying the 2010 guidelines. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Giles Peaker
This would be to under-state their involvement. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by Cyberleagle
Lesson 2: Beyond ‘manifestly illegal’ An intriguing feature of the Constitutional Council decision is that although the Loi Avia prescribed, on the face of it, a high threshold for removal of illegal content – manifest illegality – that was not enough to save the legislation from unconstitutionality. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
The courts have largely not been more helpful since the hopeful high point in 2004, when the Supreme Court in Maria Altmann v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:04 am by Tom Goldstein and Amy Howe
Jackson Women’s Health Organization and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am by CMS
“Pay now, argue later” is ultimately the decision of the Supreme Court in Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd. [read post]