Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 3,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2020, 6:50 am
In reality, most retirement plans in the United States fall under the umbrella of being a “deferred compensation plan. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:26 am
[Kruska] contends that [Brocious] also acted as contributor, owner, copyright holder, and moderator of the Blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:59 am
The Court summarizes the facts as follows: The petitioner was admitted into the United States in 1984 as a lawful permanent resident. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court issued three major rulings governing elections: In Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
In a speech on the eve of the 1940 election addressing the United States’ defense capabilities as World War II engulfed Europe, Roosevelt pledged, “Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:44 am
On March 20, 2013 Microsoft requested permission to submit an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on the standard-essential patents (SEPs) part of the "Posner appeal" (Apple v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
In Ron Pair, the United States was an oversecured creditor protected by a nonconsenual tax lien. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
United States (1944), which had allowed the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
For an institution that likes to lecture the whole world--at times even the United States--about democracy and the rule of law, it's remarkable what the Commission's draft SEP regulation envisages. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
`The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly,’ this Court has said, `lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
2 May 2019, 2:54 pm
In Abrasic 90 Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
`The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly,’ this Court has said, `lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
`The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly,’ this Court has said, `lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:06 am
Roughly two and a half months later the United States Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:03 am
After the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided last week to deny Apple's motion for a rehearing en banc (full-bench review) of the Nexus ruling, some commentators suggested that this was the end of Apple's push for sales bans against Samsung and, looking beyond that dispute, all makers of Android-based, patent-infringing devices. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:44 am
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to reconsider his decision to bar Huawei from enforcing a couple of Chinese patent injunctions prior to a San Francisco trial. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:58 pm
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
Debtor otherwise has no assets in the United States, is not a party to any lawsuits pending in the United States, and is not believed to be currently residing in the United States. [read post]