Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 7,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2022, 4:16 am
Indeed, in recent public remarks, senior FBI officials have raised alarms about the rising number of cases involving minors and the lack of useful legal tools available. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
And he denied a defense motion to dismiss the charges, abate the proceedings, and disqualify certain officials from participating in the Commission because of public comments they had made about the interim order. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Existing case law holds that employers are strictly liable for harassment committed by “officials who may be treated as the organization’s proxy. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 6:14 am
Section III is the core of the policy—this is where you’ll decide things like: whether you want to adopt new tools to help magistrates and/or judges navigate bail decisions; how judicial officials should handle ability to pay determinations; and whether to require written findings of certain bail decisions. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
We do not see why government officials may not vigorously criticize a publication for any reason they wish. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:42 pm
"We're asking them to reach a little higher than the minimum ... legal standard," Steve Carter said. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:25 am
This case, on the other hand, involves alleged public sector contacts. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:49 pm
(My view is that they should be removed, but that decision is not mine to make.) [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:30 pm
Horsley posits that despite China’s inconsistent practice of open, participatory, and law-based decision-making, the country’s efforts and experiences in modernizing its administrative policies may be valuable in developing similar administrative reforms related to transparency and public participation in other countries. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
A degree of consumer stupidity we’re not prepared to tolerate. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:40 am
Although eliminating some of the incentive credits for businesses and individuals may make sense, the decisions should be made after independent study of the success or failure of the incentives in achieving their objectives. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:31 am
(When you’re done here, go read those links to pieces by Andrew McCarthy.) [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
They’re approaching housing on a regional basis. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
They’re approaching housing on a regional basis. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:07 am
Judicial officials also are required to provide a statement of facts supporting their decision. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
Initially, they're required to appear every week in court. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
Attorneys for Trump challenged the Pence subpoena on executive privilege grounds to preserve the confidentiality of presidential decision-making. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
It has been effectively undermined by a series of Supreme Court decisions beginning in the 1970s: In Cohen v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am
The late Justice William Brennan expressed a more specific regret about his choice of the legal term “actual malice” as the standard to be used in libel lawsuits filed by public figures or public officials. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:35 am
Deleting “personally” from the existing law will subject all things of value given to anyone with a connection (either professional or personal) to a public official to prosecutorial scrutiny and will create uncertainty with regard to items such as campaign contributions. [read post]
