Search for: "In re D. W."
Results 2601 - 2620
of 4,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2020, 7:15 pm
Keinen Erfolg hatte die Migros allerdings bislang mit dem Versuch, allein die Flaschenform und allein die charakteristischen farbigen Querstreifen als Marken schützen zu lassen: Der Markenschutz allein für Flaschenform und Querstreifen wäre wesentlich stärker. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am
If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast, or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:59 am
(And you thought you’d never use algebra.) [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:15 pm
The complaint also tells us that GNR is a partnership organized under California law, its general partners currently being “W. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:49 am
The menu is very simple, not pretentious, so we spent the whole time writing down the details to see what we'd eaten! [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:46 am
Div. 2005), rev'd on other grounds, 189 N.J. (2006). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:31 am
Morley and edited by David W. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:40 am
See also: Video: Recalibrated Machine in W. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:30 am
Now that we’re not paying Louisiana to house some of our prisoners, maybe we can take some of the money we’d been spending on that and use it to hire a few more guards. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:07 am
(Or so w thought… ) Let’s see if I can answer your questions in order, OK? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 7:11 am
Dadurch hat es aber nicht die Beweislast zulasten der Beschwerdeführerinnen umgekehrt, denn auch im Stadium der materiellen Prüfung wäre die Zulässigkeit des Freihandverfahrens nicht einfach durch die Vergabestelle zu beweisen (negative Tatsachen). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:12 am
“[W]e made $100,000? [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 6:19 am
See In re Boucher, 2007 WL 4246473 (D. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 5:48 pm
§ 260.12(d)). [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:17 pm
W is for the Wikimedia Foundation (the operator of the popular Wikipedia site), which won an important legal battle over cyber-libel when a B.C. court ruled that merely linking to content did not amount to re-publication. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm
W. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
If instead the single criterion were SAT score, we’d be down in the list, well behind MIT and California Institute of Technology. . . . [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm
It states in part that a mark is abandoned, “[w]hen its use has been discontinued with intent not to resume such use. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 3:06 pm
The Court of Appeals corrected the trial court and indicated that it was incorrect for the trial court to re-classify the post-DOS distributions as W-2 income for the Wife, and thus her separate property. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:26 am
RT @Lawyer4ERISA: Left 2 y/o w/out diaper this evening before bath. [read post]
