Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 2,865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Wiseman Jr. said his decision to toss the case was supported by the plain language of the FCA, 31 U.S.C. 3729, and by case law, including United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:46 pm
James M. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 10:17 am
There are two interesting aspects to this. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
United States, a case initially brought in state court and removed by the government to federal court, challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
United States, 505 U.S. 144, 156—159, 177 (1992). [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
The "statement of counsel" signed by John Whealan states:Based on my professional judgment, I believe the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States: The Telephone Cases 126 U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
It cites hundreds of cases and covers hundreds of issues. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:43 am
Perhaps the most significant criminal case in our collection was United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:41 pm
Parker was selected for her role as the lead prosecutor in the successful 2008 case of United States v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
Ed. 2004). - James M. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:52 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:40 pm
(The statute has been declared unconstitutional by two trial judges in recent litigation, and one case is on appeal by the state. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:10 pm
She's a member of the United States Attorney's Organized Crime Task Force. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:35 pm
The case is reported at U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
NSSTA's backward step: Re-focus on "protecting, preserving and promoting" structured settlement laws already enacted in the United States Internal Revenue Code and 47 state structured settlement protection statutes; Consolidate and transition NSSTA's administrative, financial and political strengths. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm
Worse for the creditor was the fact that the Court found that the creditor should pay actual and punitive damages of $21,820.00.In James Bradley Collier v. [read post]
