Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
These were termed informal means of dispute resolution, since they did not receive state sanction and were largely ignored as a creole cultural idea which had little to do with the proper regulation of society. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
These were termed informal means of dispute resolution, since they did not receive state sanction and were largely ignored as a creole cultural idea which had little to do with the proper regulation of society. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
These were termed informal means of dispute resolution, since they did not receive state sanction and were largely ignored as a creole cultural idea which had little to do with the proper regulation of society. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court but the 1765 English ruling by Lord Camden in Entick v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:03 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clarke v R [2012] EWCA Crim 9 (20 January 2012) Oliver, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3114 (21 December 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3129 (16 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civi Division) Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors v HM Revenue & Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2012) Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2012) Charnock & Ors v Rowan &… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes reserved judgment in the case of Woodrow v Johansson On 20 January 2012, the Administrative Court handed down judgment in the R (Associated Newspapers) v Lord Justice Leveson ([2012] EWHC 57 (Admin)). [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
While it is not possible to develop this point in more detail here, it suffices to state that what Lord Hoffmann really appears to have intended is a test to distinguish cases in which legislative intent is consistent with a degree of artificiality (for instance Lord Hoffmann’s own example of conveyancing) from those in which it is not. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Counsel also relied extensively on the judgment of the UK Supreme Court (particularly Lords Mance and Collins) in Dallah Real Estate v Government of Pakistan, which we have discussed here, to suggest that a court must always have jurisdiction to examine matters which are “fundamental” to an arbitration, such as arbitrability of the dispute, whether there was a valid arbitration agreement etc. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
In a unanimous ruling the Court held that the UK could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to his native Jordan, overturning the House of Lords (who had unanimously come to the opposite conclusion in RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10, [2010] 2 AC 110).” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 19th January 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
In a unanimous ruling the Court held that the UK could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to his native Jordan, overturning the House of Lords (who had unanimously come to the opposite conclusion in RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10, [2010] 2 AC 110).” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 19th January 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:24 am
OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Judge Purdy respectfully endorsed the 'very powerful observations' of Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9, who disapproved of general considerations but accepted the exceptional circumstances in which Article 8 would lead to a discharge of an otherwise perfectly proper extradition request. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The petitioners have pulled together an experienced legal team, including Lord Anthony Gifford, counsel to the landmark case of Dudgeon v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
BBC and Dominic Casciani v Secretary of State for Justice High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) [2012] EWHC 13 (Admin) January 11, 2012 High Court rules Justice Secretary’s refusal to grant BBC permission to have a face? [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
It is true, as Lord Phillips observed in the House of Lords’ judgment in the present case, that one of the reasons for the prohibition is that States must stand firm against torture by excluding the evidence it produces. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
In general, the Secretary of State reviewed a whole life tariff after 25 years’ imprisonment. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Certainly this reasoning is supported by the authorities cited by Floyd J at [85]-[89], to the effect that even though an invention is obvious to try, it is nonetheless obvious only if it is “more-or-less self-evident that what is being tested ought to work” (Lord Justice Jacob in St Gobain v Fusion Provida [2005] EWCA Civ 177 [35]) and there must be a “fair expectation of success” (Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49… [read post]
