Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 70,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 9:26 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) takes on another automobile-related trademark case, this time between General Motors and Jim M. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 12:03 pm
No surprise: “Legal experts had predicted the court would not exercise its discretion to add the case to its docket, citing well-established legal precedent and the court’s low acceptance rate. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 7:47 pm
., June 5, 2017) (affirming summary judgment for Alerus: it is the duty of the plaintiff asserting a breach of fiduciary duty claim under ERISA to prove losses to the plan)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:44 pm
., July 10, 2017) (affirming denial of benefits because Olson still had residual capacity for light work despite cervical fractures, degenerative disc disease, obesity, bilateral hearing loss, and joint degeneration)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 1:10 pm
., February 12, 2016) (affirming denial of disability and supplemental benefits based on review of issues not raised below, learning disability, simple work limitations, GAF scores, and credibility)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:42 pm
., December 23, 2015) (affirming dismissal of wrongful termination claimbecause Hogan failed to identify and public policy his discharge wouldcontravene)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:27 pm
., August 25, 2015) (clarifying the causal standard of the direct-and-natural-results test: recovery requires primary, workplace injury to be a significant contributing cause of subsequent, non-workplace injury)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 6:45 pm
., July 25, 2017) (granting Consolidation's petition for review of Department of Labor award of survivor's benefits to employee's wife: the ALJ incorrectly stated the rebuttal standard, which, however, requires an employer to rule out causal connection between pneumoconiosis and death to rebut a connection)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case,… [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:26 pm
., May 20, 2016) (affirming denial of disability based upon Jones's failure to show inconsistent or insufficient evidence against the determination)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:35 pm
., May 25, 2017) (affirming denial of disability insurance and social security income because the appellate court may not reweigh evidence and the Frey/Thompson analysis was present)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:48 pm
., June 13, 2017) (affirming denial of Lopez's fee application under the Equal Access to Justice Act following his successful appeal; the decision appealed from, however, was substantially justified despite its being wrong)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:04 pm
The effusive billionaire owner of the Dallas Mavericks had accused the S.E.C. of hounding him because he was famous. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
Said the Board, "[w]e have indeed seen corporate bullying, and this is not such a case. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
There was no anecdotal evidence of actual confusion, but the court perceptively noted that "because defendant has not begun to use its VAGISAN mark in United States commerce, a lack of anecdotal evidence of confusion is unsurprising and is thus not meaningful in this case. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
In cases T‑696/19 and T-697/19 – Teva v EUIPO, the General Court confirmed that EU trade mark applications for Moins de migraine pour vivre mieux and Weniger Migräne. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
The CJEU has already confirmed, in yet another Nestlé case ("Have a Break…", C-353/03), that acquired distinctiveness can be proven even though the mark is always used with other marks (in that case with "…have a Kit Kat"). [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Since that decision, plaintiffs have flooded the courts with complaints seeking relief for false patent marking. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:33 pm
MARK STEYN'S CANADIAN KANGAROO COURT: Andrew Coyne is liveblogging the proceedings. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
According to BrokerCheck records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) advisor Mark Solomon (Solomon), formerly associated with M Holdings Securities, Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:16 am
Autec simply did not sell cars.Art.5(2)*It was the ECJ's duty to provide the national court with all elements that could be useful for judging the case. [read post]
