Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2601 - 2620
of 21,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
at *7 (quoting Goro v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
at *7 (quoting Goro v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 6:08 am
In any event, plaintiff failed to state a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 against Berkowitz. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
However, the second case I read as a law student, the infamous World War II era case of Liversidge v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:24 pm
Strict scrutiny applies in many free exercise cases, for example, notwithstanding Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
FTC + State AGs Looking to Make Money? [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 6:51 pm
This has been the case regardless of what formal test applies, the proportionality test outside the United States, which expressly calls for judges to weigh the relative costs and benefits of a restriction, or the Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:59 am
How far does the first sale or "exhaustion" principle extend in the United States? [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 7:08 am
Ein völkerrechtlicher Vertrag wäre nicht erforderlich. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Following United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:25 am
In Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
From Judge Randall Shepard's majority opinion in Chapman v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:11 am
Monster Energy Company v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 1:34 pm
This is important because some states have different laws surrounding NDAs.[5] 9. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 12:12 pm
From Rainwaters v. [read post]
