Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am by Sonya Hubbard
Our 2012 M&A report, published last month, lists 10 companies that we see as likely acquisition targets. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:43 am by SHG
If anything, the fact that Penn State is under federal jurisdiction in this matter precludes the college from coming up with a new scheme to circumvent the authority of Judge Brann. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
Your coat is non-verbal communication that you: a) need a shield; b) just got there; c) don’t trust the host’s coat check; d) are not healthy enough to keep your body at 98.6; e) are imminently about to leave. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 1:39 pm by Charon QC
” The GCSE results were out today and trending on twitter… A’s, B’s C’s. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
I’m also surprised that it was not argued that possession pursuant to a notice to quit violates Art. 8, following McCann and Cosic. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:18 pm
Section 274(m)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code strictly forbids deductions for bringing spouses and dependents along on business travel unless the spouses and dependents (a) are employees of the taxpayer (here, the taxpayer is the governor), (b) are travelling for a bona fide business purpose, and (c) would otherwise be entitled to deduct the travel on their own tax returns. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:54 am by admin
  (b) these attributes have to be consistently and accurately recorded, and the human beings who input them are neither consistent nor always accurate, and   (c) even if they were, people are not perfectly rational buyers and sellers. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am by admin
A Protectionist Country Blocks Two More Big Deals, Petronas Rejection Casts Doubt on CNOOC $15.1 Billion Bid, Market braces for Petronas fallout, Mulcair Slams Feds on Handling of Petronas Deal, Petronas Deal on Hold Not Dead. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences … [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:45 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
  In this case, Melendez was:  A)  Convicted of statutory rape; B) Based upon conclusive DNA evidence proving he conceived this child, which was followed by:  C) A voluntary confession, to hopefully avoid a jail sentence – which he did. [read post]