Search for: "Matter of Thomas J."
Results 2601 - 2620
of 2,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:28 am
Rudell and Neil J. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:52 pm
., Thomas J. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:27 am
First addressing the question whether this was a substantial enough change of circumstances to make it appropriate to reconsider the earlier custody order, Judge Thomas J. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:42 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In Thomas J. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
BAILEY, J., concurs. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
Thomas Sullins, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): Tina N. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:01 pm
Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468, 484 (2003) (Breyer, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
No matter which jury Mr. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
" Thomas Aldrich v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:36 pm
J. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Here is a great position paper/study by a Forensic Psychologist, named Steven J. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
My buddy, J. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
Thomas v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 3:32 am
Thomas to dissent, joined by J. [read post]
20 May 2008, 6:00 am
Thomas; Does the Plaintiff Matter? [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:45 pm
Said Code section is further amended by revising subparagraphs (a)(16)(J) and (a)(16)(K) as follows:- This is where it is adding to the existing 42-1-12 sections the new information which has to be supplied to the sheriff. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:10 am
Levitt and Scott J. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:43 am
Thomas Sullins, Judge. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:51 pm
Patil, Trushant Shah, Faramarz Robeny and Fredo Joseph (collectively the "plaintiffs") appeal from a June 2, 2006 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Castel, J.), granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee City of New York (the "City") and denying the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. [read post]
