Search for: "New v. State" Results 2601 - 2620 of 107,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
In turn, Max Mosley v News Group Newspapers, is a prime example of a claimant not having advanced knowledge prior to publication and therefore being unable to prevent publication.The basis of Max Mosley v UK is best summarised by Dominic Crossley (Steeles Law LLP) stating:“…although we all have a right to privacy, it is entirely up to the editor of a newspaper whether or not we are able to exercise that right in any effective or meaningful way. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Since that time, the Court has made it harder to regulate guns, as the Court in 2022 held in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Supreme Court stated in dismissing the claim that s 94(5) of the Act reads as referring to countries where its citizens are free from any serious risk of systematic persecution either by the state or by non-state agents. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:17 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In regards to the ground that the respondent’s decision was disproportionate under EU law, the CJEU judgment in Rottman did not state explicitly that a Member State’s decision as to the acquisition or loss of national citizenship was outside the scope of EU law. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:30 am by Eric Goldman
Vimeo Russia Fucked With American Democracy, But It Can’t Fuck With Section 230–Federal Agency of News v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:05 am by Eric Goldman
Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Schlossman
Beginning this Term’s series of five-minute podcasts on oral argument days, we have two new podcasts below with attorneys who filed briefs on both sides of Snyder v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:16 am
 Tiffany & Co. v. eBay Inc., No. 08- 3947 (2d Cir. [read post]