Search for: "People v James" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(PLI)   US Patents Constitutional separation of powers (Patently-O) Patent practitioner ethics update (Patently-O) Interesting claim on Big 3 patents – discussion of Detroit New editorial by James E Malackowski (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Lawyers getting patents: what should the rules be? [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm by Rosalind Early
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As James Madison declares in a powerful passage in Federalist 37, the Bible is in fact not transparent in its meanings. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
People who had to figure out a way to pay for their mortgage, education, retirement, and so on. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm by WIMS
EPA failed to conduct its proper due diligence and now the American people will be forced to pay the price. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:32 am by Scott Bomboy
A day earlier in Europe, President Obama had more pointed remarks for the Supreme Court and its acceptance of the King v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:23 am by The CGCP Team
James Yuan (Associate Managing Editor, CGCP; Covington & Burling LLP, Shanghai). [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:53 am by Michael Geist
No one ever in our world said that by passing a law we were going to change consumer behaviour overnight and turn people away from taking things. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
This election cycle makes clear that we no longer can afford to leave education off the table for millions of children.The Supreme Court in Wisconsin v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm by familoo
It was implemented as a result of the decision of Sir James Munby (as he then was) in Kent CC v B (RE B (A CHILD) (DISCLOSURE) [2004] EWHC 411 (Fam) [2004] 2 FLR 142) to render lawful that which Munby had said was a regular but inadvertent contempt precluded by s12 Administration of Justice Act 1960: disclosure between professionals in furtherance of child protection. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Ron Friedmann
I hope we learn more here about how data can help avoid lawsuits or at least reduce the expense of dealing with them  Speakers:  James Lee, CEO/Co-Founder,  LegalMationPatrick V. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm by Katherine Rohde
HCBS programs are especially vital in light of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead v. [read post]