Search for: "People v. Lowe" Results 2601 - 2620 of 4,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2010, 2:56 pm by Steve Erickson
  For better or worse, the courts have decided that legislatures are free to craft laws which provide for civil commitment of people who have dangerous mental abnormalities that "creates a likelihood of such conduct in the future if the person is not incapacitated" (Kansas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Ronda Muir
” Research has shown a consistent relationship between high physician burnout and low patient safety and quality of care, a result that, of course, also impacts hospitals’ bottom line. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:59 am by Kevin
The published opinion I referred to in my earlier post, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:08 am by Justin P. Webb
Well, it appears the government continues to have issues in this regard.In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Part III argues that defensive patenting "left companies defenseless against patent-assertion entities" and has "driv[en] the demand for low-quality patents. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
There’s a tangle of five related relists, all of which present something of an interesting question (or at least, “interesting” by the low standards of people who voluntarily read into the seventh paragraph of Supreme Court blog posts). [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
In upholding the first instance decision, Dingemans LJ reiterated the principles to finding malice from Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Not a legal claim (RT says: though it easily gets encoded in law—see Field v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Wang
Nash and Dreweke argue in favor of policies that dismantle the “legal, logistical and financial barriers to abortion,” which are “largely borne by low-income individuals, people of color, and young people. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]