Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
Yes, he certainly did -- once he was instructed by his superiors that the division statute did not apply to the facts of this case. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
            In our post on the worst decisions of 2013, we highlighted two trilogies of dreck, the First Circuit’s Neurontindecisions and the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s Reglan decisions. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 4:16 am by SHG
Precedent is a separate legal doctrine, requiring inferior courts to adhere to the holdings of superior courts. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson 2018 ONSC 2527 (CanLII), Justice Nakatsuru of the Ontario Superior Court noted that “[s]entencing is and has always been a very individual process. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm by John Hopkins
A lawsuit has been filed in the Superior Court at Bridgeport in Connecticut, which may well allow for a meaningful hearing of these and many other questions. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Doe, 2011 ONSC 4663 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ordered an anonymous blogger sued by a defendant in the Lawbuzz defamation case to reveal his or her identity. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  From 1795 through 1934, Congress regularly sanctioned people who defied its authority, and many Supreme Court decisions recognized its “inherent” power to do so. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1353 (Cal. 1996); MacDonald v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]