Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 12,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm
For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:21 pm
Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its decision in People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:05 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:52 am
The case is Radwan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
In the ensuing divorce settlement the wife took 60 percent of the asset, leaving the husband with the remaining 40 percent. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
But pursuing litigation with little to no damages is sure to draw the ire of a busy district judge.The second case, Patch Rubber Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:15 am
There is no such evidence in this case.The case is Myers v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:01 am
In Schlegel v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 12:28 pm
In Reno v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm
(The internal quotes go to Gregory v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:16 pm
They don't have to tell you what action they took. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:20 pm
In Kidane v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:28 am
UniversalLawrence Lessig v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
What these people had demonstrated during this period of time was that they did not recognize the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over HKSAR, and they did not support the policy of the “One Country, Two systems”. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:32 am
The Commonwealth of Kentucky then took its turn to appeal, and the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am
The plaintiff claims that the assault took place in the courtyard situated between 41 and 43 High Street, Hempstead, New York. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:10 pm
Less epochal than Apple v Apple, but still interesting. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Against this background, what do we make of the oral argument that took place earlier this week? [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm
In People v Lester (N.Y. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
In People v Schreier, 22 NY3d 494 [2014], the Court made clear that surreptitiousness is a separate and distinct element from whether the recording was done without the subject’s knowledge or consent, and is also separate and distinct from the requirement that the recording took place in a location where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy (both of which are also required by the statute). [read post]
