Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 2,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., has said that the government will decide by mid-November on its plans for each of the more than 200 detainees still at Guantanamo. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., has said the government may make up its mind about detention policy by the middle of November. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
" Finally, Chief Justice John Roberts was named the tenth most powerful man in Washington by GQ Magazine's recently released list. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Treasuries. [32] In September of this year, China became the largest holder of U.S. government debt, holding over $585 billion dollars. [33] Volatile China-U.S. relations could affect U.S. interest rates and lead to unnecessary volatility in the domestic money market, cascading yet again into injurious consequences for global economic recovery. [34] V. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 1:04 pm
See Ramirez v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:33 pm
See CA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:05 pm
" Sarl Louis Feraud Int'l v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
Holder, 08-1449). [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
" Solomon v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
On the first complaint, the facts of the case line up very closely with the Universal v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Holder, 09-89). [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:14 am
See, e.g., Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
I had not planned to blog about this decision, announced yesterday, in Skelos v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:52 am
The most important case for such takedowns, also cited by Sheffner, is the Perfect 10 v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
Discussion Of the rights afforded to the patent holder (“Holder”) none is more powerful than the right to an injunction.[7] Injunctive relief allows the Holder to obtain a court order requiring the defendant to cease any infringement, thereby protecting the aforementioned monetary interests which incentivize innovation. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
Those assets should then be distribited to holders of debt owed by the “old Chrysler,” the funds argued in Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
As the Supreme Court has framed the general issue of determining damages, at least for competitors, a court must ask, "[H]ad the Infringer not infringed, what would [the] Patent Holder[] have made? [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Check out this case:It basically states that unless your lender actually signs your loan modification agreement then YOU DON'T HAVE A LOAN MODIFICATION.Has anyone actually gotten a signed loan modification? [read post]
