Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 2601 - 2620 of 4,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:00 am by Erik Manukyan
As NSO Group notes in its reply brief, Republic of Philippines v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
It is the policy of the United States that such a provider should properly lose the limited liability shield of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) and be exposed to liability like any traditional editor and publisher that is not an online provider. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
It is the policy of the United States that such a provider should properly lose the limited liability shield of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) and be exposed to liability like any traditional editor and publisher that is not an online provider. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:38 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
First, the Second Circuit rejected the BOE’s argument that its use of a facially neutral state licensing requirement – LAST – shielded it from liability under Title VII. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm by Bona Law PC
The Chinese vitamin C sellers argued that they are shielded from US antitrust law liability by the act-of-state doctrine. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm by Bona Law PC
The Chinese vitamin C sellers argued that they are shielded from US antitrust law liability by the act-of-state doctrine. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 1:49 pm by Joe Mullin
While EFF has long expressed concerns about the free speech implications of the 2008 Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:41 pm
  Failure to have health insurance coverage would result in personal tax penalties from the state. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
The Shield Act (stands for Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes) claims to be a solution to this. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm by David Super
  Doing so, however, would inevitably lead to charges that he is shielding the President for political reasons. [read post]