Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 2601 - 2620 of 10,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2018, 5:00 pm by H. Scott Leviant
For years I've heard grumbling about Civil Local Rule 23-3 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Unknown
Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) [preprint]- Chapter 4: Commentary on United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:57 pm
Further, the the Supreme Court of United States declined hearing the case, because the court determined that such a law did not violate the federal Commerce Clause. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 5:34 am by Mark S. Humphreys
ERISA lawyers will be watching this United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm by Ronald Mann
United States is a case in which the opinion was just what the comments of the Justices at the argument presaged: a terse and uncompromising rejection of the tribe’s claim. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
The GDPR is an EU regulation that seeks to protect the privacy of EU citizens' personal data by limiting transfer of such information among EU member states as well as between EU countries and the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:33 pm
§ 4A1.2(a)(2) is an issue of second impression across the breadth of the federal courts, it deserves more serious analysis than the judicial sleight of hand performed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Morgan and adopted by this court today. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
At least for Mushegh Minasyan, who was statutorily required to file his application for asylum within one year of his arrival in the United States on April 9, 2001 and who filed on April 9, 2002. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:52 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In short, the CWA prohibits the discharge of materials into "navigable waters" without a federal permit, and the Act defines "navigable waters" as "waters of the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
This week’s excuse for a short post requires just two words: Amtrak WiFi. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am by John Elwood
Doster, 23-154Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which the Court held that trial courts could not impose longer criminal sentences for the purpose of rehabilitation. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
It is reported that several years ago, the mark Pet Rock was registered as a trademark in the United States (unfortunately due to the power outage at the USPTO offices in suburban Washington DC, this Kat was unable to verify this information). [read post]