Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 3,478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
People of Freedom – known as PDL (Popolo della Libertà) – symbol (Class 46) Kenya Kenya’s Anti-counterfeit Agency comes out with blazing guns (Afro-IP) Netherlands District Court of The Hague – Tédé v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
The altruism some people would substitute for it may, when it has arrived, bring with it a higher sense of justice but it has not arrived. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
In fact, this is a well established procedures and such injunctions have been granted in cases such as Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown [2015] EWHC 2628 (QB) and Smith v Unknown Defendant [2016] EWHC 1775 (QB). [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm
“In the 2024 annual report released today, the CECC once again stands with the Chinese people against the Chinese Communist Party,” said CECC Chair Smith. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
That's from the newly-released eBay v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
ABC News had an article “There are two versions of the facts at Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
CompuServe approach and possibly Smith v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
”); People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Calcutt v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am
The decision in Holder v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:44 am
Alexander Smith, 231 S.C. 1, 97 S.E.2d 199 (1957)). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:32 am
Smith v. [read post]
