Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm
Regents of the University of California, Trump v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that the United States Federal District Court for the Southern District of California abused its discretion when it refused to award a victorious patent plaintiff a permanent injunction where the patentee directly competes with the infringer. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
This was evident in the fact that the birth rate in the United States fell dramatically from 1800 to 1900. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 10:43 am
Under California law, and the common law throughout the United States, when someone is injured as a result of the negligence of others they are entitled to recover as damages the reasonable amount of their medical bills, in addition to other damages such as pain and suffering, lost earnings, loss of earning capacity etc. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 10:58 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:31 pm
The Court ruled in SB Liberty (in May of 2013) that Section 1363.05 of the California Civil Code (now found in Civil Code Section 4925) specifically states that members may attend an association’s board meetings. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am
Regents of California (1976), which imposed a “duty to warn” on therapists, and Sindell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am
Additionally, Monsanto admitted that it never conducted any long-term carcinogenicity studies on any of the formulations that it’s sold in the United States.Holding:The Court held that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIRRA) 7 U.S.C. ch. 6 §136 et al. does not preempt state law. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
The Ninth Circuit overturned a $102 million dollar judgment issued by United States District Judge Lucy H. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 12:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 5:06 am
See Mangini v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 8:02 am
Conair Corp – United States District Court – Southern District of California – August 19th, 2016) is a certified class action involving the sale of the Conair (defendant) Infiniti Pro 1875 Watt model 259/2791 hair dryer. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Senator Wade pointed this out and suggested guaranteeing rights to all persons born in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Senator Wade pointed this out and suggested guaranteeing rights to all persons born in the United States. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:26 am
The United States legal system is immensely complex. [read post]
