Search for: "State v. Clark"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 3,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
Nike went after one end user for ordering Chinese counterfeit trainers via the Internet: EWPCC summary judgement in Nike v E Bateman (IP Dragon) Crosstown Music bitten by partial assignment of copyright: EWCA decision in Crosstown v Rive Droite & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Possibility of obtaining summary judgment in patent cases: Patents Court decision in Virgin Atlantic v Delta (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keeping down the price of copyright justice (1709 Blog) United… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:09 pm
The Fourth Department, in Clark v Boreanaz also allowed a modification proceeding to continue in New York under Domestic Relations Law § 75-d (1) (b) even though New York was not the child's home State. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:31 am
The Fourth Department, in Clark v Boreanaz also allowed a modification proceeding to continue in New York under Domestic Relations Law § 75-d (1) (b) even though New York was not the child's home State. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 3:13 am
” Mischcon de Reya and Osborne Clarke summarised the recommendations and its implications for developers, companies and individuals. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm
See Griggs v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Heather Capital - Lord Woolman’s opinion: Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and othersOUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2015] CSOH 115 CA207/14NOTE BY LORD WOOLMANIn the causeHEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Pursuers; againstLEVY & McRAE AND OTHERS Defenders:Pursuer: Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC; Shepherd & Wedderburn LLPDefenders: Clark QC, J Brown; Simpson & Marwick14 August… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:15 am
But a quick glance at the list and I saw a couple of the seminal cases in patent law history and a big one is right there at 140 days- Festo Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
The question in Kay v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
Clarke, 944 F.3d 243 (Dec. 6, 2019). [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
The Heymann team argues that these gaps must be addressed and that states must take steps to ensure adequate enforcement of the laws. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
While he was still on the City Council, he had some run-ins with two local community activists, Clark and Brendan Nelson. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:30 am
Andrews v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:03 am
In Peugh v United States, SCOTUS ruled federal criminal defendants must be sentenced under the guidelines in effect when the crime took place, not higher guidelines in place when the defendant is sentenced. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:35 am
Taylor – exemptions case before Schwab v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
The High Court ruled that the BBC could film and broadcast an interview with Babar Ahmad, a terrorism suspect who has been detained in the UK without a trial for seven years, after the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke refused permission. [read post]
