Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2601 - 2620 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2015, 6:47 pm by Robert Epstein
  The Court of Appeals elaborated that this presumption is one of the strongest known to law. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
Predictability, empiricism and the effect of timeThe Court of Appeal of England and Wales, in Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma A/S [2015] EWCA Civ 779 (see Katpost here), has recently reversed a finding of obviousness by Mr Justice Birss at first instance ([2014] EWHC 3096 (Pat), see Katpost here). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by John Elwood
I, § 8, cl. 17, to prohibit the removal of that land from state jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
The dissent cited Supreme Court Rule 10(a) to highlight that the cases fit easily into a category commonly inviting Supreme Court intervention: a division on a federal question among federal courts of appeals affecting every state and tens of millions of Medicaid recipients. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE UPPER DECK COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v.ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:47 am by Unknown
“This is probably going to be appealed and there are some areas here that I think are vulnerable to appeal. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by Susan Brenner
Capello, 2012 WL 2811535 (Superior Court of New Jersey – Appellate Division 2012). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They relied on the following statement by the Supreme Court in the 1928 case of Frost v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by jonathanturley
However, it is an example of using cases to appeal to the court of public opinion. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:04 am by Nancy Van Tine
  In Casey, the Appeals Court ultimately concluded that the Probate Court had erred in treating pension payments as income as opposed to treating the plan itself as an asset subject to division. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:04 am by Nancy Van Tine
  In Casey, the Appeals Court ultimately concluded that the Probate Court had erred in treating pension payments as income as opposed to treating the plan itself as an asset subject to division. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
I am pleased to be part of the 2023 conference on SEC Regulation Outside the United States to deliver the Fifth Annual Scott Friestad Memorial Lecture. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am by Jason Rantanen
I was thus intrigued to see a case that harkens back to the heyday of the old SDO deception cases in a pair of recent decisions in Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:46 am by John Inazu
  One of the cases that we examined was United States v. [read post]