Search for: "State v. David" Results 2601 - 2620 of 12,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
Commentators continue to discuss Monday’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:31 pm
The movie does not allude to it, since it was released in 2005, but the story has a post-script: Massey Coal's influence in the election of Justice Benjamin wound up before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Caperton v. [read post]
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 11:15 pm
, (Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 8, No. 2, Spring 2007).David R. [read post]
McCormick filed suit following a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on May 20 in Miglioi v. [read post]