Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 5,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
Jordan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
Jaime is quite involved in this field, having contributed to last week's New York State Bar Association Online Market on the subject. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:45 am
First up is Kimble v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:27 am
The case is Feliciano v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:08 pm
Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
After the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
After the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm
In Deitz v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published today in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék -- that's the Budapest Municipal Court, if you didn't know ["I knew that", said Merpel ...]. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am
His motion argued that the dealership agreement and state regulations required her, as a non-employee family member, to return the car. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:31 pm
Nor did Petitioner state that he observed the mark applied to any of the goods. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
The Washington court held that Music Group had shown `good cause’ for the requested discovery. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:20 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Wilson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Courts within the Ninth Circuit generally consider whether a plaintiff has shown `good cause’ for early discovery. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus is on the process… [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
A call for sanity‘Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
