Search for: "State v. Greening"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 6,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 3:50 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Kiennitz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:25 pm
In Santis Produce LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 9:34 am
The case of Greene v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
In White v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court in the 1984 case Chevron v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 2:15 pm
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am
Greene v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
Green v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm
Green Dev. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm
Green Dev. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:34 pm
Sebastian) or common law actions (Georgia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
US v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
[pdf] View E-Briefs in THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
This has been repeatedly confirmed both by local courts and the ECtHR (P v Poland [2012] ECHR 1853). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:22 pm
But that was the backdrop for a recent case, People v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:28 am
The case is Scoppola v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit then reversed, interpreting the Supreme Court’s plurality opinion in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
" A party may bring a claim to recover legal fees already paid to his or her attorney on the grounds that the fees were excessive (see Boslia v Green berq, 63 AD3d 973 [2nd Dept 2005] ) , and such claim is not considered duplicative of a legal malpractice claim (&; see also Loria v Cerniqlia, 69 AD3d 583 [2d Dept 20101). [read post]
