Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 2,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm
Not only did Judge Kavanaugh for Justice Kennedy, he has spent the past twelve years contending with the administrative state on the D.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Circuit Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Texas, as well, to the states. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
I have a profile of Kavanaugh for this blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 1:27 pm
Chief Judge Garland and Circuit Judges Kavanaugh and Millet’s’ eyeballs must have been bulging when they learned how the Government came across Dawayne (“Goon”) Brown and his associates in the PCP distribution trade. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Bob Barr urges the justices to hear Blagojevich v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
The court’s decision in the case of PHH Corporation v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm
Notably, Judge Kavanaugh stated in a concurring opinion that the Court’s "four-factor test for awarding attorney’s fees in FOIA cases is inconsistent with FOIA’s text and structure, and impermissibly favors some FOIA plaintiffs over other equally deserving FOIA plaintiffs. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:57 am
Although it is unclear precisely what standard the Appellate Division applied, it cited its prior decision in Tapp v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
First up is Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
McRae and Webster v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:15 am
Last month I published a post here about the Solicitor General’s nominal “Petition for Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
