Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
Hicks challenged the finding that the question as to whether lack of ornamentation could be a feature of a design was not central to the case and, in any event, unarguable.Paragraph 50 of the judgment was highlighted in which Lord Neuberger first states that there are powerful arguments against the conclusion that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the Trunki CRD and then appears to consider the initial Trunki product and subsequently registered designs as supporting lack of… [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgment [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm
The Lord Justice Clerk concluded his judgment by saying “The present action arises because the pursuer came to Scotland to acquire a cause of action. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am
Bishops in the House of Lords On Thursday, there was a debate in Westminster Hall on Bishops in the House of Lords introduced by Tommy Sheppard (Edinburgh East) (SNP). [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm
In April 2011 a Joint Committee of the Lords and Commons was set up to consider the bill. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:57 am
In 2011, a successful application for security for costs was made before Lord Justice Sedley and Lord Justice Pitchford. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:47 am
The influence of a “graduated approach to proportionality” had two benefits; it took root in society without being perceived as being imposed from above, and it even influenced Strasbourg case law – see for example the extensive quotations from Lord Bingham’s judgments in Pretty v DPP when the Strasbourg Courts came to consider the case in Pretty v United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Léveillé, [1933] S.C.R. 456 (S.C.C.), the Court considered the role circumstantial evidence plays in meeting the burden of proof and stated at para. 35: The general principle in accordance with which in cases like the present the sufficiency of the evidence is to be determined was stated by Lord Chancellor Loreburn in Richard Evans & Co., Limited v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 11:35 am
The Dutch court also decided in favour of attribution to the sending state. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:30 am
Lord & Samuel Williston, Williston on Contracts §45:20 (4th Ed. 2000). [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 12:32 pm
Lord Denning’s statement on auditor skepticism was recently cited with approval by the Singapore Court of Appeal in United Project Consultants v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
Praise the lord and pass the ammunition. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
In light of the wording used by Lord Neuberger, PCCM was effectively trying to obtain a similar monopoly without registration, relying on its repute among UK residents. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
The House of Lords clarified the “serious harm” test for defamation claims, stating that the claimant must prove that the publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
As evidence of this trend, read of some of the posts linked to below, showing how judges are approaching security issues now, and then read this passage from Lord Denning in the 1977 case of R v SSHD ex p Hosenball [1977] 1 WLR 766 at 783: There is a conflict between the interests of national security on the one hand and the freedom of the individual on the other. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:56 am
From McQueen v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:36 am
The Court, instead, looked to an older House of Lords judgment, Dubai Aluminium Co Ltd v Salaam [2002] UKHL 48 (“Dubai Aluminium”), in order to consider the test “afresh”. [read post]
