Search for: "State v. Masters" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
  The Court of Appeal may appoint a special master to assist in managing and processing the case. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged about this in August, but now there’s a District Court decision dismissing the indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am by Robert Chesney
An interesting Afghanistan habeas decision today, from the UK:  Yunus Ramhmatullah v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
The claimant appealed once again, the case now coming before the Master of the Rolls (alongside Moses and Munby LJJ) in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by INFORRM
The Master of the Rolls’ Committee on super injunctions earlier in the year emphasised in its Report its fundamental constitutional status, and stated that the principle “applies to interim injunction applications as it does to trials”. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm by Simon Gibbs
That is the substance of what the Master of the Rolls was there saying. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:06 am by Christopher Danzig
In denying Apple’s bid to stop Samsung from selling its Galaxy smartphone and tablets in the United States, U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) provides that In a criminal case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime... [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:41 pm by David Ettinger
”) Because referendum signatures have been submitted to California’s Secretary of State, the writ petition in Vandermost v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The same day the Court of Appeal (the Master of the Rolls, Sullivan and Black LJJ) will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case of Hutcheson v Popdog Ltd. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 11:52 am by emagraken
In the recent case (Ornstein v. [read post]