Search for: "State v. Price" Results 2601 - 2620 of 13,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2019, 6:32 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
Commonly used shotgun provisions allow one party to set the price and allow the other party to decided whether to buy or sell at the offered price. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:07 am
The Court also held that the collateral order doctrine did not allow the Court to review the District Court's joinder order.The decision in Price v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:04 pm
David Benowitz is a criminal defense lawyer in Washington DC and founding partner of Price Benowtiz LLP. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Nabiha Syed
Wyeth (09-152), Harrington v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 6:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In the Lawrence County case of Harland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Consumers could always compare the ticket price to prices listed on the Yankees' website.The decision is Weinstein v. eBay, Inc., CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,295.Further information about CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law appears here. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 3:55 am by INFORRM
Finally, the Court was not convinced by Mr Barbulsecu’s explanation of why the account was used for personal purposes (he maintained it was because mobile phone prices were high and work demand was low at the relevant time). [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:06 am by Paul Kirgis
The Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Delaware Coalition for Open Government v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
In light of states’ differing responses to the Wayfair v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
A former general counsel of a diagnostic lab, who participated in a qui tam action, violated his ethical obligations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, ruled the Second Circuit (United States of America v Quest Diagnostics, Inc, October 25, 2013, Cabranes, J). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:16 am by Larisa Vaysman
  The district court declined to consider whether Collins could have offset the refurbishment price differential by lowering the price of its ink, stating that this would only be relevant in a predatory pricing case. [read post]