Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 2601 - 2620 of 57,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:22 am by Rebecca Johnson
“The new Succession Planning Toolkit is a one-stop shop for attorneys to find everything they need to plan ahead and prevent their partners or loved ones from being left to handle everything if the unexpected happens,” said bar president Cindy V. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am by John Coyle
  The same cannot be said of its analysis of the next step—determining which state’s law would be more impaired if not applied. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:44 am by Admin
Excerpt: Smeltzer pointed to two taxpayers’ recent loss in Jarrett v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:44 am by Admin
Excerpt: Smeltzer pointed to two taxpayers’ recent loss in Jarrett v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
True, Jackson opposed the bank on policy grounds, but he also denied that the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]