Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 2601 - 2620 of 16,386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 7:05 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
These measures were the focus of a wide-ranging Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter) attack by several applicants in the Federal Court case of Spencer v Canada (Health), 2021 FC 621 (CanLII). [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:57 am by Florian Mueller
The number one issue that Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers raised on the last day of the recent Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Literature claims: strong TM protection is likely to lead to investment into strengthening the mark, not to innovation in product; and TMs are more valuable for incremental innovation than basic, so that might induce overinvestment in existing tech rather than new and untried tech. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 2:00 pm by Unknown
State of Washington (Private Property; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)Sisto v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm by Alvaro Marañon, Benjamin Wittes
  These ongoing discussions have inspired numerous policy suggestions at the federal level, but the first legislative move occurred when North Carolina’s House of Representatives passed a bill banning state and local agencies from making ransomware payments. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:38 am by Daniel
There are often other severe consequences.At Lulich & Attorneys, we’ve been strong advocates for criminal defendants for 35 years. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:51 am by Daniel
These substances are categorized from most severe (schedule I) to least severe (schedule V).Illegal possession of a prescribed drug.Other illegal drugs. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:08 am by Giles Peaker
Kalonga, R (On the Application Of) v The London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 2174 (Admin) While Croydon v Kalonga on terminating flexible tenancies during the fixed term is to be heard by the Supreme Court (our report on the Court of Appeal here), Ms Kalonga’s fixed term has come to an end and Croydon had served the requisite s.107D(3) notice stating their intention not to grant a further term. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]