Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 4,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2017, 7:28 am
Gilbert & Arthur Sullivan, H.M.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:54 am
The case is Hayes v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 12:00 pm
The Supreme Court emphasized the danger that defamation suits can pose to First Amendment freedoms in New York Times v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
Sullivan (1964) and later cases. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
Michael Reisman, Babel and BITs: Divergence Analysis and Authentication in the Unusual Decision of Kilic v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:37 pm
This, indeed, appears to me to have been the though of the majority of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in McCarthy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
The Court uses this case to clarify the rules for certain collective actions.The case is Scott v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 1:25 pm
After identifying a series of trial errors, the Court of Appeals has ordered that former Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin is entitled to a new trial on her defamation claim against the New York Times, which ran an editorial in 2017 that linked Palin to a mass shooting that took place in 2011.The case is Palin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan argued that China will not fix North Korea, offering four other areas of focus instead. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The Court finds the plaintiff may proceed with his case even through his Article 78 was not successful.The case is Whitfield v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
When I was invited to give a speech in Florida this month as part of a fiftieth anniversary commemoration of the decision in Gideon v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
Wilson, November 30, 2018, Sullivan, R.).Noting that the case involved the CFTC’s pre-Dodd Frank legal authority, CFTC Chairman J. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
SULLIVAN, RICHARD W. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Sullivan.) [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:40 am
The Court says that plaintiff did not speak out as a citizen and that, even if he did, his speech was not on a matter of public concern.The case is Shara v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:45 am
As he explains, "Rule 48(a)'s 'principal object' was never 'to protect a defendant against prosecutorial harassment,' Rinaldi v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Vopper; Cohen v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 2:30 am
LIPPMAN, P.J., MAZZARELLI, SULLIVAN, ... [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:35 pm
Three examples are: NAACP v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
