Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2013, 4:05 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
Religious holidays provision in Taylor Law agreement held unconstitutional Board of Education of the Mineola UFSD v Mineola Teachers Assn., 2013 NY Slip Op 02070, Appellate Division, Second Department The Mineola Teachers Association appealed an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County that granted the School District’s petition seeking to permanently stay the arbitration of a grievance alleging that the School District breached the “religious holiday”… [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Employees in the Labor Class are not within the ambit of either §80 or §80-a of the Civil Service Law [which sections of law provide certain rights to employees in the competitive and non-competitive classes in the event of a layoff] but employees in the Labor Class may be accorded layoff rights based on “seniority” pursuant to a Taylor Law agreement provided that any such contract right does not adversely affect the statutory layoff rights of other employees [see City… [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:40 am
See Binta v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
Next week in Parliament Monday 25 March 2013, 2.30pm, Legislation – Crime and Courts Bill [HL] – Consideration of Commons amendments – Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Main Chamber, House of Lords. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
If a past practice involving a mandatory subject of negotiation is established the Taylor Law bars the employer from unilaterally discontinuing that practice Town of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
On a balancing exercise, the Court found that an Article 8 challenge would have no real prospects of success and a possession order was made.Comment: it is interesting to observe in this case a focus on the decision to continue with proceedings rather than to start them, which one gets from Central Bedfordshire v Taylor para. 40 and Pinnock para.45. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
On a balancing exercise, the Court found that an Article 8 challenge would have no real prospects of success and a possession order was made.Comment: it is interesting to observe in this case a focus on the decision to continue with proceedings rather than to start them, which one gets from Central Bedfordshire v Taylor para. 40 and Pinnock para.45. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 10:32 am
Anónimo, Taylor, Pa. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:03 am
This reasoning was adopted by the Newfoundland Court of Appeal in Taylor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
Taylor. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
As the Fourth Circuit noted in Taylor v Progress Energy, Inc, the reason judicial approval is required for FLSA settlements is to ensure that a settlement of FLSA claims does not undermine the statute’s terms and purposes. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:40 am
Calhoun v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:36 am
(Taylor) as the general contractor to build the facility. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 7:49 am
It is some evidence of impact, which is not logically unrelated to injury. [11] I agree with Taylor, J. in Yeh v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 3:25 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear four appeals this week:Feb. 18 — Federal Court — Divito v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 3:28 am
Department of Justice (DOJ) announced it has moved to intervene in a private Title VII lawsuit alleging sexual harassment and retaliation by the State of Maryland, Queen Anne’s County, and the Queen Anne’s County Sheriff (Murphy-Taylor v State of Maryland). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
*** In some instances a probationary employee may have a contractual right to challenge his or her termination as set out in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
