Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 2,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
On the first complaint, the facts of the case line up very closely with the Universal v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:38 am
The first case is State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
See Volusia County v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
The same analysis, on a larger scale, applies here. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:44 pm
In today’s case (Sauer v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:31 am
For the past several weeks, I have been summarizing the thousands of copyright consultation submissions. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
I am always a bit humbled when a victim of food poisoning stands up to the corporations who poisoned them with food – especially food labeled “triple washed” and “ready to eat. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:54 pm
If there is a move to legislate this issue, there should be a wide scale and informed discussion on how to amend the law and lessons be learnt from countries such as Britain and Pakistan. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
To balance the scales, I’m going to give a belated snap to the prosecutors in State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm
When it was his turn to talk about his ambitions, he had scaled back considerably from dreams of space travel: He said he wanted to operate the jackhammer on a construction crew.Everyone laughed. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
Lusby v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:46 am
It is clear that most of the people chattering across the Internet on either side have never read the bill (arguably, many who voted on did not either). [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:29 pm
Citation: U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
Many times people forget that step, which can save a lot of time and grief.Then it draws a sliding scale of effort required based on factors such as the likelihood of finding the rights holder, the age of the work, the status of the creator (professional/amateur), and the proposed distribution of the work (narrow, easy takedown v. widespread distribution). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:09 pm
Many times people forget that step, which can save a lot of time and grief.Then it draws a sliding scale of effort required based on factors such as the likelihood of finding the rights holder, the age of the work, the status of the creator (professional/amateur), and the proposed distribution of the work (narrow, easy takedown v. widespread distribution). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:34 am
Less than a year later, the California Supreme Court struck down the state's death penalty in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
V. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
In S and Marper v UK 30562/04 [2008] ECHR 1581 (4 December 2008) one of the reasons given by the European Court of Human Rights for holding that the UK’s retention of innocent people’s DNA records on a criminal register infringed their right to privacy was the lack of sufficiently strong safeguards. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Dolan v. [read post]
