Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 5:55 am by Harold Hongju Koh
We should not forget that the rule of law problem the United States faces is bigger than Trump. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
It claims to process over 250 million devices per month within the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 5:43 am by Ashley Deeks
Perhaps the most significant concern is the risk that the United States will unintentionally slide into war or escalate a conflict. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Helferich sold a license to its patents “to what, at least at one time constituted most – we may assume all – of the manufacturers of mobile handsets for sale in the United States,” according to the Federal Circuit. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
(The IP Factor)   Japan Japan to sign ACTA this weekend (Michael Geist)   Poland A letter of consent and something more (Class 46)   South East Asia Patent protection in the ASEAN region (Foreign Filing Blog)   Switzerland Acquiescence not a factor in opposition proceedings (Class 46)   United Kingdom Copyright in court judgments: a matter of access (1709 Copyright Blog) SuperGroup: Fashion, recession and IP (IPKat) Damages cap now in place (PatLit) PCC Page 39: The… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The core question is whether the right to be forgotten is limited to only those EU Members States to which the law (Directive [95/46/EC]) is applicable or whether it applies to all instances of the data requested to be erased on the web. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
A ruling in their favor, which abortion advocates fear is imminent, could have implications for access to medication abortion all over the United States.The core issue in the case relates to procedures the FDA used when it first approved Mifeprex in 2000. [read post]