Search for: "United States v. Little"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 10,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2021, 12:12 pm
In a decision of considerable significance in the world of wage and hour litigation, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit significantly departed from conventional standards for assessing conditional certification under Section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:36 am
That’s the tough lesson that an LLC member facing termination of his membership status learned in Costello v Molloy et al., 73 Misc 3d 1206(A) [Sup Ct 2021]. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm
Khan is Legal Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am
The United States Supreme court in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
[iii] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 11:13 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm
§ 1503, which was limited with a pending-proceeding requirement in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
This case reminds me a little of the Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:56 am
In the United States District Court, Southwestern District, Tempe, Arizona Case No. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:20 pm
These cases conform the trend of 2010--the cases deal more with specific instances occurring outside the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
United Farm Workers Nat. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
United States, 546 U.S. 12 (2005) makes this rule non-jurisdictional. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:24 am
In order to be a proper use of the Taxing power, the PPACA’s tax components must promote the “general Welfare of the United States”—a standard that seems a little too easy for Congress to satisfy, yet empirically difficult for challengers to disprove. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:04 pm
The Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
