Search for: "United States v. Stevens"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 4,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 2:57 am
Last year, the Commerce Department said Americans spent $456 billion in ecommerce retail purchases, an amount equal to 13 percent of all retails sales in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, dissenting in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
On February 7, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i decided State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:24 pm
Facts: This case (Jordan Queen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
” (Here, on the defendant’s dime).United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
This Guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:43 pm
When asked at oral argument to identify an example of unprotected, proscribable speech or conduct that could only be prosecuted under subsection (A)(iv), the government pointed to United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
United States (extending Belton to all “recent occupants” of a vehicle) should be abandoned in favor of the rule that the majority ultimately adopts in its opinion. [read post]
8 May 2011, 4:02 pm
") United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:44 am
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
Toronto, Ont. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
Finally, at Slate, Rick Hasen comments on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
Discussion of the Citizens United decision continues. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Yet if that explains (albeit without justifying) the majority’s rejection of the due process and equal protection claims, a threshold requirement of support in constitutional text cannot explain the bottom line in Jones, because the plaintiffs also relied on an express constitutional text.They invoked the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, which provides: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote” in any federal election “shall not be denied or abridged by… [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Thornton, supra) (emphasis added). [8] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
