Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2009, 2:23 am
People don't make false confessions, right? [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 7:03 am
"When it comes up, I don't let it faze me. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:29 am
Of course, we don't know how many of these folks were have had different outcomes if the SBI had not engaged in this misconduct. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 4:45 am
Augenstein raised very valid questions:"On Apple's website we can see how much security matters to Apple. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am
That's why one of the two apps I'm working on (yes, taking time, but this is definitely the year of the launch) will be released on iOS first, though we're now (again) doing some Android coding as well. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:11 pm
I don't think I'm one of those bloggers. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 2:33 am
It also doesn't mean that he has any competence to defend a person whatsoever. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:32 am
Appellate courts don't like to second-guess trial court attorneys' fees rulings, and this ruling reflects that deference. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 4:13 am
Although we don't allow Christmas presents these days.JCP: That's not a present. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 9:47 am
(Defense lawyers, by contrast, might be telling jurors they should stick to their guns, hoping for hung juries.)Whether such cautions were given at the start of the Ted Stevens deliberations, I don't know. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
I don’t see how it could be. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 3:16 am
This isn't what we do. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
Therefore it'd be foolhardy to rely upon the oral argument to make any predictions about how the Court will decide the cases.So instead of offering any such predictions, in this post I'll simply offer some thoughts on three issues the Justices and defendants' advocates raised, apart from those I discussed in my post here last month. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 2:56 pm
If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to call. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
Instead, this Court's precedent requires that we judge the truth or falsity of an allegedly defamatory statement by identifying the "gist" of what the statement conveys about the plaintiff to a reasonable reader of the entire article. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 10:07 pm
" We might be tempted to characterize it as an uncontrolled outburst of local Texan pride or a display of old-school "home cooking" (e.g., "'these Californians' should know that's not how we do things here in Texas"), but it appears that Judge Weiner is from Louisiana, so that dog won't hunt ("You Californians should know that's not how we do it in the… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:32 am
They can assign adjectives just fine, and the ones that don't make it into orders might be even more colorful. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:18 am
"I don't think it has any purpose in a process of balancing justice," complained Jack Banas, the St. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
(For what it's worth, I think the House has the better of the argument on the reading of the statutes--but that question isn't before the en banc court.)The parties don’t disagree that if the suit were styled simply as an effort to compel the defendant officials to comply with the law—an argument that the Executive is acting ultra vires—the House wouldn’t have standing. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Let’s start with the typical relists, and, if we aren’t all squashing our “H” and “J” keys with our noses while snoring loudly when we finish, maybe we’ll include a word or two about the CFRecords. [read post]
