Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Some of this evidence was indicative of Delaney's guilt of the offenses charged in the indictment. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
I don’t see how it could be. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 3:57 pm
The author concludes with a reference to that pesky little Seventh Amendment's right to a jury trial, a right that medical malpractice tort reform advocates don't mind turning away from to suit their purposes. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
(For what it's worth, I think the House has the better of the argument on the reading of the statutes--but that question isn't before the en banc court.)The parties don’t disagree that if the suit were styled simply as an effort to compel the defendant officials to comply with the law—an argument that the Executive is acting ultra vires—the House wouldn’t have standing. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:24 pm
But you weren't, so you can't. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:43 am
In deciding to impose public censure, the Commission concluded that among other things, the judge scheduled "her more interesting cases on the day of the filming" (p. 1), remarked to a defendant in a criminal case after placing him on probation "'[w]hat this means is don't come before the court on another case ... 'cause you will definitely be screwed and we don't… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
There's not much we can do about it, but that doesn't make this observation any less true.Bausch is one of a number of cases involving a recalled PMA device, a total hip replacement system called “Trident. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
They don't always rule the way I would, but they don't go off on wild tangents like some judges on the Ninth. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 12:33 pm
It's a specialized practice area that a lot of folks don't even realize exists. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 2:56 pm
If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to call. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:41 am
This is shaping up to be one of the most important criminal and business law conferences of the year, so if you are in or near the DC area on the 15th, don't miss it. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:08 am
Don't make threats against someone whose power far exceeds your own, and upon which you can't deliver.There has been a growing sense amongst law students, and even newer members of the bar, that we are all relative equals in the law. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 3:30 am
Never mind that the plaintiffs didn't and couldn't prove that any of the outstanding problem was caused by any of the defendants. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 4:45 am
Augenstein raised very valid questions:"On Apple's website we can see how much security matters to Apple. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
As Judge Posner noted in the Seventh Circuit's opinion: We don't understand why all three cases were not assigned to the same judge. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:03 am
These are altogether different situations.Judge Markey raised other issues, standard ones in confrontation cases, but I don't think either has merit, and both were rejected by the majority. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 2:21 pm
We still don't know the answer to that question with anything like certainty. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
Because of that (rather questionable) conclusion, any plaintiff in a securities fraud suit is “presumed” to rely on any material disinformation.Even assuming that’s true in the securities arena – a proposition we don’t really accept – it’s certainly not true where prescription medical products are concerned. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 2:33 am
It also doesn't mean that he has any competence to defend a person whatsoever. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am
That's why one of the two apps I'm working on (yes, taking time, but this is definitely the year of the launch) will be released on iOS first, though we're now (again) doing some Android coding as well. [read post]
