Search for: "YOUNG v. STATE"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 8,044
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm
For updates on Lindsay’s case, visit the Hecox v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
That is why both older generations and young people – those who were born after the tragic collapse of the Soviet Union – have voted for our unity, for our common future.In 1991 in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, representatives of the party elite of that time made a decision to terminate the Soviet Union, without asking ordinary citizens what they wanted, and people suddenly found themselves cut off… [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:55 pm
The latest case against Iceland, Egill Einarsson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 6:24 am
See Smallwood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 5:48 pm
The petition of the day is: Butt v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:32 am
The Court held that its decision in Ex Parte Young allows a federal court to hear a lawsuit for prospective relief against state officials brought by another agency of the same state. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:25 pm
In Marek v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:00 pm
In fact, the Wells Fargo v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:52 am
In Morris v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Young v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
” Judge Young pointed out that to assist the judges in interpreting the expert’s response to that question, the state and federal Supreme Courts have provided broad starting points, founded in evidence Rule 702. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 11:48 am
Alvarado saw some young men outside and asked petitioner if someone had been chasing him. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:46 am
State, supra. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
In a case which college football fans will have some familiarity with, U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Since a toy store will attract children, Justice Saxe believed that Penny Whistle was required to protect its young customers from foreseeable harm. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:19 pm
Bolger v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:38 am
In Whalen v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:04 pm
Sir John Thomas stated that, following A-G v MGN [2011] EWHC 2074 (Admin), the test is whether “publication would have given rise to a seriously arguable ground of appeal if the trial had been allowed to continue and proceeded to conviction”. [read post]
