Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court" Results 2621 - 2640 of 3,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
… It seemed better on all sides to work together,” city General Counsel Cindy Laquidara told board members as she explained the settlement proposal. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am by Maxwell Kennerly
App. 1989) (mere acceptance of a settlement in a prior suit does not foreclose a malpractice suit against the attorney who handled the case); Thomas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:49 am by Milad Haghani
He was appointed to the Quebec Superior Court in 1983 and promoted to the Court of Appeal in 1992. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
PAIT Defendant was convicted of first degree kidnapping and indecent liberties with a child on 9 May 2008 in Cumberland County Superior Court.[ 1 ] On 10 December 2008, in Robeson County Superior Court, defendant entered a guilty plea pursuant to North Carolina v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:30 pm by Douglas Reiser
This is a battle that many a construction attorney has had to battle. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:09 am by cdw
District Court in Savannah, Georgia, on July 7, 2010: Defendant’s brief and Attorney General’s brief. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
SUPERIOR COURT OF SOLANO COUNTY In August 2008, the Solano County Health and Social Services Department—Child Welfare Services (the Department) received a referral of general neglect indicating that Mother had tested positive for crystal methamphetamine at the birth of her son, R.P. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:16 am by Matt C. Bailey
Superior Court, 46 Cal. 4th 969 (2009) that PAGA claims need not satisfy class action requirements.The Court Disagreed. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:58 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Dear Readers: My good friend and brother in Christ George Nicoletti a well-respected Real Estate Attorney, Litigator and Counselor at Law had some interesting commentary regarding the Mabry v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:31 am by John Steele
Superior Court, 705 P.2d 347 (Cal. 1985)(invalidating a contingent fee arrangement in a public nuisance case) with San Francisco v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In order to get to the Superior Court to address the consolidation versus severance issue, which is typically raised by way of preliminary objections, permission to appeal on an interlocutory basis must be secured by the litigants from the trial court. [read post]