Search for: "BRIGHT V US"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 4:19 pm
Network v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:45 am
Opinions are starting to come out of the the US Supreme Court, too. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
In an earlier post on this topic, I noted the decision of one Delaware judge in Xerox Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
On the bright side, this week, Law Shucks notes that some lawyers really are bargains at $1,000 an hour. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
On the bright side, this week, Law Shucks notes that some lawyers really are bargains at $1,000 an hour. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 2:28 am
Where a trademark preexists a domain name the registration may be suspicious but “a legitimate right or interest can certainly be created in an arbitrary or entirely fanciful mark, through lawful adoption and use,” 7(S) Personal GmbH v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:11 pm
The decision in Price v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:44 pm
For example, in Bright v. 99¢ Only Stores (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1472, the court held civil penalties available under PAGA, consisting of $100 per each "aggrieved employee" per pay period for the first violation and $200 per "aggrieved" employee per pay period for each subsequent violation, could be recovered because no other penalties for violating the seating requirements were provided by law.This week, during the California Supreme Court's… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
And, if there’s a bright side (which I usually try to find), we’re hoping the nourishment he’s getting through his PICC line will fatten him up some, since he’s a little guy to begin with. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
He does this again by use of vivid scenarios. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm
The Smith v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Thus, the Supreme Court's decision appears to validate the use of a § 220 proceeding to support a pending derivative action regardless of a prior dismissal order. 7. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:17 am
Cohen v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
Remember my too-bright question?) [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
In Bright Wood Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:52 am
In King v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:10 am
The Supreme Court decided a case in 1990, Illinois v. [read post]
