Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 2621 - 2640 of 5,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
 At a bare minimum, Baker does not control the argument--raised by the Perry plaintiffs at trial and thus available as a basis for affirming on appeal--that Prop 8 is invalid as motivated by animus under the theory of Romer v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 5:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This would be a similar situation as abortion following R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/6YyfKMRmiC -> No Personal Jurisdiction Over Nasty Facebook Post–Burdick v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
" Aside from this bare assertion, however, no explanation is given to support the proffered interpretation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Denver in the case of Kitchen v. [read post]