Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 2621 - 2640 of 14,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2007, 7:23 am
Patrick Guinane of the NWI Tmes reports today on yesterday's Supreme Court ruling in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published today in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék -- that's the Budapest Municipal Court, if you didn't know ["I knew that", said Merpel ...]. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm by rquintilone
In June 2007, Nicholas filed a complaint against Chen stating multiple causes of action related to alleged breaches of contract and torts committed by Chen during his term of employment. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, the Appellate Division found that the State's "non-impairment clause" set out in Article V, §7, of the State Constitution was "not implicated as the challenged action does not involve a change directly related to retirement benefits.Considering the Petitioners' arguments challenging the "cost-cutting" measures the City elected to use "to pay for the PPL benefit," the Appellate Division held that the method… [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 12:00 pm by Tinker Ready
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on Tuesday in Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 12:12 pm by John Jascob
Even if this were not the case, the plaintiff pointed to no outright false statements, nor statements that were rendered false due to nondisclosure (Guo v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am by CECILY WHITE
The employer would bear the costs and liability of such litigation and therefore must “be able to make his own investigation into the claim to assess its strength based on the conduct of his employee and the prospects of a successful defence”: [30]. [read post]