Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 14,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider which party in a claim for discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010 bears the burden of proving that discrimination has or has not occurred. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
At the federal level, United States trademark law is governed by the Trademark Act of 1946, or the Lanham Act, which provides for, among other [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:00 pm
(See Hetzel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:00 pm
(See Hetzel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
United States Dep't of Labor, 477 F. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Excise taxes on rental cars are levied at the state-level in 44 states. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 11:15 am
In my previous post on the VLSI v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
And Tandon v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 am
Although the money was paid around mid-February, it’s clearly grown because The MLC is to hold the funds in an interest bearing account. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
A few weeks back, in Meriwether v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Later that same day, as journalists and bystanders watched, the applicant, Kaloyan Handzhiyski, the then chairman of the local chapter of the party Democrats for a Strong Bulgaria (DSB), arrived, and placed a red Santa Claus cap on the head of the already painted statute and, at its feet, leave a red sack bearing a white band marked ‘Resignation’. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 7:50 am
Supreme Court’s opinion in Bearden v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 10:58 am
And in Morse v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
On March 29, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 11:38 am
It is indeed true, as the GC states, that if all features of interconnection were solely dictated by a technical function, there would have been no need for the legislature to introduce Art. 8(2), because Art. 8(1) would have sufficed to cover those cases;therefore, according to the GC, certain products – namely: those products whose features of appearance concerned by a design (i) permits the connection of that product to another product for which (ii) those functions are the only… [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 10:18 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm
I would deny the application largely for the reasons stated in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:21 am
A state cannot control its people on the basis of negatives (e.g., we are not the United States). [read post]
